Bonus Depreciation Thwarts Partisanship

Yesterday more than 100 associations, representing a cross section of industries on the front line trying to grow and create jobs in a fragile economy, urged in a letter to conferees on the payroll tax cut extension bill HR 3630 to include in the final conference agreement an extension of 100% bonus depreciation (sometimes referred to as 100% expensing) through 2012.

This provision has garnered bipartisan, bicameral support as well as the support of the White House. The broad support is due in part to the fact that bonus depreciation allows manufacturers to write off the full cost of capital investments, e.g. plant machinery and equipment, in the year of purchase rather than over the depreciation life of the capital investment, which typically span 10 to 20 years.

Given our fragile economy, this provision gives a temporary boost to the customers who want to buy and the suppliers who want to manufacture capital equipment in the USA.  Jobs are maintained and created. Just ask small manufacturer Campbell Fittings of Boyertown, PA, about job creation related to this provision effective for past 2 years. Bonus depreciation drove his company’s decision to make more capital investments that resulted in hiring 40 new workers in the past 15 months to run the new equipment. If 100 percent bonus depreciation were extended through 2012, he plans to make more capital investments.  The new equipment allows his company to compete with foreign competitors. 

Today’s Wall Street Journal article “With Tax Break Corporate Rate is Lowest in Decades” was disingenuous in citing a price tag of $55 billion in each of the past two years for bonus depreciation.  Bonus depreciation is a timing issue, and as such, that means companies can write off the cost of a $100,000 piece of new machinery purchased this year and thus would not be taking depreciation for the next nine years for a typical piece of machinery.  

Kudos to Congress and the Administration in recognizing this private sector job creating provision given our abysmal unemployment rate exceeding 8 percent. Capital investments equal putting people back to work.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


I.R.S Slaps New Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers

Although one might think that it was near impossible, the U.S. tax code just got worse for manufacturers of medical devices. Manufacturers lament the IRS’s issuance of a new regulation to implement 2.3% excise tax on medical devices that was included in the President’s health care law. The NAM has opposed this tax because of the impact it will have on the ability of the medical device industry, a true American success story, from competing and innovating on the new products and devices that will help save lives.

This new tax appeared during the debate on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as a way to help “pay for” the bill. The 2.3% tax will have the effect of raising the effective tax rates for medical device companies – over 80% of which are small businesses with fewer than 50 employees – forcing these companies to have to make tough decisions about how to fill the earnings lost to additional taxes.

At a time when so much of the conversation in Washington centers on the need to increase jobs, stimulate growth and encourage innovation, the imposition of this excise tax completely contradicts these messages. U.S. medical device manufacturers are the world-leaders and the imposition of this new tax will have the effect of making the industry less competitive and reducing capital to invest in new R&D, new technologies and new employees. With contradictory actions like these, praising the industry for its life-saving innovations while slapping a new tax on them, it’s no wonder that so many have expressed a lack of faith in what’s going on in Washington.

Carolyn Lee is NAM’s Senior Director of Tax Policy

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Union Elections Already on Fast Track – No Need for ‘Ambush’

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has been making a case that representation elections need to be put on a faster track. When the Board originally published their “ambush elections” proposed rule, their notion of an ideal timeframe between when a petition for certification and the actual election worked out to 10-14 days. Of course, employers were concerned about such a compressed schedule for a number of practical reasons, but it also violates a fundamental sense of fairness most Americans hold with regard to elections.

While the final rule did not truncate the election time period as much as the proposed rule, it does shorten it to somewhere in the neighborhood of 20-24 days according to some experts. Employers remain concerned about the timing of these elections, because they often are not aware an organizing campaign is going on until they receive notice the petition has been filed. At that point, the employer has some tough choices to make and different rules to follow about how and what they can communicate to their employees. In short, they have serious ground to cover in order to catch up – meanwhile, the clock is ticking.

As we anxiously await the NLRB General Counsel’s Summary of Operations report for fiscal year 2011 – which according to my research results has not been issued later than February 4th in the last ten years – I thought it would be good to go over some historical data about representation elections and paint a picture to show what’s really going on and why employers believe the Board’s ambush elections rule is a solution in search of a problem.

Over the ten-year period from 2001-2010, an average of 2,356 elections were petitioned for each year. Of that number, 89.9 percent of the petitions were agreed to by both parties. The median time it took from the time the petition was filed to the date of the election was 38.9 days. Finally, 93.8 percent were completed within 56 days – though in full disclosure I could not find data for 2001, so this number is really a nine-year average, but the yearly percentages for an election to be completed in 56 days ranged from a low of 91 percent in 2002 to a high of 95.5 percent in 2009. A chart is included below to illustrate these numbers.

   NLRB Representation Election Completion Rate Over the Last Decade
         
Fiscal Year Cases Election Agreement % Median Days 56-day %
2011        
2010 1790 92.1 38 95.1
2009 1690 91.9 37 95.5
2008 2085 91.8 38 95.1
2007 2080 91.2 39 93.9
2006 2296 91.1 38 94.2
2005 2715 89 39 93.6
2004 2537 89 39 93.6
2003 2659 88.5 40 92.5
2002 2871 86.1 41 91
2001 2842 88.2 40 N/A
10 year Average 2356 89.9 38.9 93.8

 

What I believe the numbers show is a vast majority of petitions and elections are handled in a timely fashion – rendering the need to ‘fast track’ election unnecessary. It appears the cases taking longer than 56 days are outliers and we can reasonably infer they represent more complex cases in which there are questions about who is eligible to vote, the make-up of the collective bargaining unit or some other complication – all of which should be resolved prior to the election being held. Employees deserve to have the information they need in order to make an important decision like joining a union and employers deserve to know the rules before the results of the contest have been decided.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Chrysler Adds 1,800 Jobs in Northern Illinois Plant

Great news out of Illinois today! Chrysler has announced that it is hiring 1,800 new workers and stepping up production at their plant in Belvidere. It’s a good story that coincides with the news that the U.S. economy gained 50,000 manufacturing jobs in the last month.

Approximately 500 of the new employees will focus on the new Dodge Dart while others will work on existing models.  The new hires represent a 66% increase in plants workforce and all are expected to be hired by the third quarter this year.

Additionally, it is expected to create hundreds of other jobs at parts suppliers and other vendors – part of the ripple effect that NAM President Jay Timmons spoke about during his January “State of Manufacturing” speech in Cleveland. He told those in attendance that:

“For every dollar invested in manufacturing, $1.35 of indirect economic activity is generated – the highest multiplier effect of any economic sector, by far. And for every job created in the manufacturing sector, up to another three jobs are created elsewhere in the economy.”

The addition of these jobs are due in large part to a pro-growth business environment for Chrysler – part of the polices that NAM has said are essential to achieve a Manufacturing Renaissance. Hopefully policy makers are paying attention to the results.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


U.S. and Manufacturing Employment Jumps Higher in January

U.S. employment numbers jumped significantly higher in January, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, with the unemployment rate dropping to 8.3 percent.  Moreover, nonfarm payrolls grew by 243,000, and manufacturers added 50,000 net new workers. These gains were greater than expected, and certainly, much higher than the estimates from ADP released two days ago. Consensus estimates had been for around 150,000 net new jobs with the unemployment rate remaining around 8.5 percent.

These numbers continue to affirm the rebound and importance of manufacturing to our economic recovery. There were 82,000 net new jobs created in the sector in the past two months. This is definitely a sign that manufacturers have picked up their activity of late. Moreover, manufacturers have added 287,000 of the 2,063,000 net new nonfarm payroll jobs generated in the last 13 months (since December 2010); this suggests that nearly 14 percent of all of the jobs generated in that time frame stemmed from manufacturing.

As I noted last month, though, we would be remiss without mentioning the fact that employment remains a significant challenge, even with today’s good news. The “real” unemployment rate – which includes discouraged and underemployed workers – is now 15.1 percent, down from 15.2 percent in December and 16.1 percent last year at this time.

There are currently 2.81 million Americans who are classified as “marginally attached to the labor force,” with 1.06 million being discouraged workers. This is up slightly from last month. (The civilian labor force also grew last month, from 240.58 million to 242.27 million.)

Looking specifically at the January 2012 figures, the bulk of the new jobs in manufacturing came from the durable goods sector, which was up 44,000 for the month. The largest gains came in fabricated metal products (up 10,900), machinery (up 10,500) and transportation equipment (up 10,300). Nondurable goods sector employment rose by 6,000 in January. In that sector, the strongest growth came in the chemicals (up 2,200), printing and related support services (up 1,700) and beverages and tobacco products (up 1,300) sectors.

The average workweek for manufacturers rose from 40.6 hours in December to 40.0 hours in January. The average amount of overtime edged slightly higher from 3.3 to 3.4 hours. Therefore, the average weekly earnings for manufacturing workers rose from $969.93 to $977.51.

Overall, these numbers show renewed strength in the domestic economy, with employment growth in almost every major industrial sector except information, financial services and government. It mirrors other recent economic indicators showing an uptick in activity since October. Moreover, several sentiment surveys suggest that manufacturers are optimistic about future production and employment in 2012, which should bode well for this year’s numbers.

Yet, it is important to remember that significant headwinds exist both in Europe and in the U.S. The labor and housing markets – while improving – still have a long way to go before they are healthy, and consumer and business optimism is mixed with persistent anxieties. Still, we will take good news when we can get it.

Chad Moutray is chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


More Political Stunts At the Expense of Job Creation

Representative Henry Waxman’s (D-CA) political games on the Keystone XL pipeline project is only setting Americans back in their quest to find jobs — good paying jobs.  Continued attempts by the Ranking Member of the House Energy and Commerce committee to cause a distraction by focusing on whether or not certain companies stand to benefit from this project is deplorable.  Americans stand to benefit.  More than 20,000 jobs will be created in manufacturing and construction, not to mention the 118,000 spin-off jobs that will also be created.  Manufacturers use one-third of our nation’s energy supply and the construction of the pipeline will provide a new source of affordable energy to manufacturers.

So let’s stop playing games. Politicians can no longer claim the need to create jobs for Americans while simultaneously using their position to stand in the way of common sense projects that would do exactly that.  America is prosperous because the private-sector fuels our economy and creates jobs — this Keystone XL pipeline project is no different.

Jay Timmons is president and CEO, National Association of Manufacturers.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Indiana Becomes 23rd ‘Right-to-Work’ State

The Indiana legislature completed passage on and Gov. Mitch Daniels immediately signed into law “right to work” legislation yesterday. The move by the state’s leaders makes Indiana the 23rd state in the nation and the first in the heartland to adopt right to work. Such measures forbid forced union membership and/or the payment of union dues or fees as a requirement of employment.

Indiana proponents of right-to-work argue that open shops will help attract new business investment and their jobs, a major political selling point after three straight years of high unemployment nationally. Governor Daniels stated, “This law won’t be a magic answer, but we’ll be far better off with it.”

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Manufacturing Productivity Falls By 0.4 Percent in the Fourth Quarter

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that nonfarm business labor productivity increased 0.7 percent in the fourth quarter, with unit labor costs up 1.2 percent. For the year, productivity in the nonfarm sector rose 0.7 percent, well below its pace of 2.3 percent and 4.1 percent in 2009 and 2010, respectively.

Manufacturing productivity fell in the fourth quarter by 0.4 percent, a reality check perhaps from the steep 5.3 percent growth rate experienced in the third quarter. Output per hour for all workers in the durable goods sector dropped 0.4 percent, as well, representing a turnaround from the 8.7 percent increase in the previous quarter.

Note that the third quarter rates were unsustainable, so the falloff should not be a total surprise; in addition, we have seen a pickup in employment – a sign that increased output and productivity has led to new hires. Indeed, one factor in the drop-off in productivity was that the number of hours worked rose 4.2 percent in the quarter, more than offsetting the rise in output of 3.8 percent.

Nondurable goods productivity, which grew more slowly at 1.6 percent in the third quarter, rose an additional 1.3 percent in the fourth quarter.

Despite the downtick in manufacturing productivity in the fourth quarter, the longer-term trend has been positive.  For 2011, manufacturing productivity rose 2.8 percent, or about half of the 6.1 percent pace of 2010. Overall unit labor costs fell by 4.2 percent and 1.3 percent in 2010 and 2011, respectively, helping to keep American manufacturers more competitive.

It is notable, for instance, that much of the productivity gains of the third quarter – which were phenomenally large, particularly for durables – was sustained. Manufacturing output rose 4.9 percent for the year. In the durable and nondurable goods sector, output increased by 8.1 percent and 1.7 percent, respectively. This is consistent with the recent recovery in activity that we have seen in many other statistics.

Chad Moutray is chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Education & Workforce Committee Hear from Small and Medium Sized Manufacturers

Manufacturers were well represented on Capitol Hill today as NAM Executive Committee member and Chair of the Small and Medium Manufacturers Group Kellie Johnson, President of Ace Clearwater Enterprises, testified on behalf of small businesses and manufacturers.

Kellie Johnson, NAM Board Member, testifies before the House Ed & Workforce Committee

The House Committee on Education & Workforce held their first hearing of 2012 entitled, “Expanding Opportunities for Job Creation”. Ms. Johnson was chosen to testify because of her insight into state initiatives for job creation, the effects of federal policies on job creation, and the challenges facing small businesses within the current economic environment.

While in front of the powerful House committee, Ms. Johnson highlighted the ways in which federal regulations burden small and medium manufacturers differently than their larger counterparts, specifically citing recent decisions and regulations from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

She hammered home the point by stating, “The uncertainty of our regulatory and economic environments makes it almost impossible for short or long-term business growth, especially for a capital intensive industry like manufacturing. To be compliant with the newest regulations and rules takes time away from running the day-to-day operations of a business. Resources are constantly rerouted away from customers, resulting in lower productivity and lower customer satisfaction.”

Additionally, Ms. Johnson took the opportunity to speak about the impediments to job creation arising from regulatory overreach from the viewpoint of a small manufacturer was a chance to emphasize the importance of manufacturing to economic growth. To read her full testimony click here.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


VP Biden Talks Manufacturing in Michigan

Today Vice President Joe Biden was in Grand Rapids, MI talking about manufacturing and following up on the proposals laid out last week by President Obama in the State of the Union.

We are happy to see the President and Vice President are continuing to talk about manufacturing and realize how important it is to the economy and job creation. However, manufacturers need the right policies to grow and create jobs.

Manufacturers are looking for the “All-of-the-Above” energy policy that includes the Keystone XL pipeline. If they Administration wants to create manufacturing jobs, the perfect project was right before them. Keystone XL will create 20,000 construction and manufacturing jobs and more than 118,000 spin-off jobs.

As the discussion continues about manufacturing and how to create jobs we hope that both Congress and the Administration will move forward with policies to let manufacturers lead the economic recovery and create quality, high-paying jobs.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


A Manufacturing Blog

  • Categories

  • Connect With Manufacturers

            
  • Blogroll

  • -->